Thursday, September 25, 2008

Leader versus Leadership

When we think of the leader, we imagine a commanding figure . . . whether a room-dominating figure, always sitting at the head of a conference table, or behind a large clean desk . . . bottom line: a leader who takes charge, aggressive, no-nonsense, etc.

Such images of leaders get us into trouble because it is not reality and it sets up a leader who will not be successful. The REAL strength of a leader is the ability to gain the strength of the group (not of the single individual). Relying on one person (e.g., the CEO) to provide all the leadership builds expectations that can never be met. Correspondingly, the group is denied its powers, thereby, leading to overdependence on the manager. When dependence is created, the leader's response is to micromanage, getting into areas of control and responsibilities that represent a poor use of time and may far exceed his/her capabilities. The result is the ultimate reduction of the productivity of the group.

A good "leader" provides a collective vision and acts as a servant to the people in the group to make sure the objectives are met (resources, addressing hurdles, providing guidance, being supportive). Whereas most of us have an image of the strong leader, the most successful leaders are actually servants to the group.

No comments: